Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
RECOMMENDED PLAN
  • Seeks approval for an integrated plan that serves as a framework for modifications and operational changes to the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System to provide for navigation efficiency and environmental sustainability, and to add ecosystem restoration as an authorized project purpose.
8
RECOMMENDED DUAL PURPOSE PLAN
  • Framework (50-yr) for Navigation Efficiency and Ecosystem Restoration.
  • Seeking authorization for first increment (15 yr).
  • Ecosystem restoration 15 yr increment = $1.58 billion.
  • Navigation efficiency 15 yr increment = $2.03 billion.
  • Adaptive Implementation with checkpoints at years 3, 7, and 15.
9
FY05 Accomplishments
  • Feasibility Study Officially Closed
  • Program Management Plan (PgMP)
  • 30 Project Management Plans Completed
  • Multidisciplinary Science Panel Formed
  • Significant progress on most projects
  • WRDA Authorization Pending
  • 98.4% Execution of a $11.237M Program
  • Continuation of PED in FY06 - $10M


10
 
11
 
12
NAVIGATION PROBLEMS & OBJECTIVES
  • Problem
    •   Potential for increased traffic delays


  • Objective
    •   Provide for a safe, reliable, efficient, and sustainable UMR-IWW navigation system over the planning horizon.
13
 
14
NAVIGATION IMPLEMENTATION
$2.03 billion in First 15 years (50/50 Cost Share)
  • Mooring Facilities @ Locks 12, 14, 18, 20, 22, 24 and LaGrange
  • Switchboats @ Locks 20 through 25
  • Adaptive Implementation of 1200’ chambers at Locks 20 through 25, La Grange, and Peoria
  • Mitigation for Site Specific and System Effects
  • Continued Study and Monitoring
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
ECOSYSTEM PROBLEMS & OBJECTIVES
  • Problem
    •   Changes to ecosystem structure and function imposed by the operation and maintenance of the existing 9-foot Channel Project


  • Objective
    •   Address cumulative impacts including ongoing effects of the operation and maintenance of the UMR-IWW Navigation System.





19
 
20
ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES
  • Water Clarity
  • Backwater Depth
  • Water Level
  • Connectivity
  • Aquatic Areas
  • Terrestrial Areas
21
 
22
ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION IMPLEMENTATION
$1.58 billion in First 15 years (93/7 Cost Share)
  • Fish Passage @ Dams 4,8,22, and 26
  • Changes in Water Level Control @ Dams 25 and 16
  • Adaptive Implementation of 225 small projects of less than $25 million each
    •   Island Building
    •   Water Level Management
    •   Backwater/Side Channel Restoration
    •   Wing Dam/Dike Alterations
    •   Island Shoreline Protection
  • 35,000 Acres of Floodplain Restoration
  • Continued Study and Monitoring
23
 
24
BALANCE
  • Balance between navigation efficiency and ecosystem restoration
  • Balance resource allocation
    • In-house
    • Other Corps
    • Other government
    • Private sector

25
ASSUMPTIONS & CONSIDERATIONS
  • Balanced Implementation between Navigation and Ecosystem
  • Project authorization at end of FY06 or early FY07
  • Construction start at end of FY07 or early FY08
  • Position program implementation to ramp up capability starting in FY07
26
ASSUMPTIONS & CONSIDERATIONS
  • BALANCE: Nav. Eff. –vs- Ecos. Rest. –vs- Pgrm. Mgmt.
  • BALANCE: Geographic Project Distribution
  • PRODUCTS: Site Specific Projects –vs- Systemic Studies
  • FOCUS: Focused Approach –vs- Diverse Approach
27
ASSUMPTIONS & CONSIDERATIONS
  • COMPLEXITY: Lg. Scale Project –vs- Sm. Scale Project
  • RESOURCING: Labor –vs- Other Contractual Services
  • CONSTRUCTION: Start Date >2yrs vs <10mo
  • AUTHORIZATION: FY07 CG Auth. vs FY08 CG Auth.
  • RISK and CONSEQUENCES
28
 
29
 
30